The United Nations has finally, after many, many years, decided to take on the most pressing issue of our time. No, we’re not talking about terrorism, child hunger, or even climate change for goodness sake..We’re talking “cultural appropriation.”
Yep, if the UN has their way, “cultural appropriation” will be an offense punishable by jail time.According to Vice, As we learn every festival season, and all other seasons too, there’s still a lot of confusion around the difference between appreciation and appropriation. There could soon be a strong incentive to get educated: jail time. Because being called out on the internet doesn’t seem to be stopping the proliferation of runway chola bangs and high street Navajo panties.
Indigenous groups around the world are currently calling on the United Nations to make the appropriation of native cultures illegal, reports CBA News. A special committee has been asking for sanctions since 2001, long before Twitter and Instagram became the default ways for offended communities to call out BS and make their cases heard. This week, though, the ball is really getting rolling. Delegates from 189 countries are currently meeting in Geneva as part of a specialized international committee within the UN’s World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
The committee is pushing for three pieces of international law to put sanctions place. This will expand international property regulations to protect indigenous property ranging from designs to language. The UN should “obligate states to create effective criminal and civil enforcement procedures to recognize and prevent the non-consensual taking and illegitimate possession, sale and export of traditional cultural expressions,” James Anaya, dean of law at the University of Colorado, told the committee. Anaya took explicit aim at Urban Outfitters’s aforementioned Navajo line, which resulted in the Navajo Nation slapping the company with a lawsuit in 2012. (The case was eventually settled out of court.)The question is how in the world they plan to enforce these “laws,” especially since doing so would violate the sovereignty of nations? And besides, if you’re half-Mexican, does that entitle you to wear only half a sombrero or would your “gringo” side negate the acceptability?
With all of the pressing crises in the world, this is what the UN decides to spend precious time and resources on? Really?
Not stopping human rights violations in Syria? Or taking measures to counteract radical Islam, which is ravaging Europe?President Trump recently threatened to leave the UN or defund the organization completely. it’s never been a better idea than right now.
[Note: This article was written by Michael Cantrell]