I went to Chicago a couple of times over the summer — beautiful city and what an awesome waterfront along Lake Michigan. However, I just have to laugh when I think of the level of radicalism and corruption in Chicago politics. Here is the lineup of famous Chicago residents: Saul Alinksy, Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, Jesse Jackson Sr and Jr (the latter being a federal prison resident), Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayres, Tony Rezko, Louis Farrakhan, David Plouffe, and of course Al Capone. Now combine that with the number of incarcerated former politicians and the fact that in June of this year, the Communist Party of the United States held its 30th convention in Chicago.Heck, the college football team pushing for a collective bargaining for players is Northwestern University located where? Evanston, a suburb of Chicago.
So therefore, it actually should come as no surprise to find out Hillary Clinton and famed leftist community organizer, Saul Alinsky, exchanged correspondence. (For reference, Alinsky’s infamous book, Rules for Radicals, is dedicated to Lucifer — and those pesky secular humanists get upset at U.S. Marines singing at a Christian worship service).As reported by the Washington Free Beacon, “Previously unpublished correspondence between Hillary Clinton and the late left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky reveals new details about her relationship with the controversial Chicago activist and shed light on her early ideological development. Clinton met with Alinsky several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis about his theory of community organizing. Clinton’s relationship with Alinsky, and her support for his philosophy, continued for several years after she entered Yale law school in 1969, two letters obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.
The last thing America needs is another left wing ideologue espousing progressive socialist policies. The problem for Hillary Clinton is that she’s tried very hard to hide her radicalism – as a matter of fact, she’s doing everything possible right now to distance herself from ol’ brother Barack. However, she’s not trusted by the progressive Left or the rest of America either. We all know Hillary Clinton as a shrewd deceptive operator, not personable and willing to tell a lie at the drop of a hat. Plus, the Clintons have more scandals following them than the days are long — hmm, sounds like a familiar tune of the past six years. After all, they were all spawned from the same corrupt social organizing political machine. They’re just serious rivals.Free Beacon reports the letters it obtained “are part of the archives for the Industrial Areas Foundation, a training center for community organizers founded by Alinsky, which are housed at the University of Texas at Austin. On July 8, 1971, Clinton reached out to Alinsky, then 62, in a letter sent via airmail, paid for with stamps featuring Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and marked “Personal.” “Dear Saul,” she began. “When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out—or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation?” “I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille [for Radicals] and need some new material to throw at people,” she added, a reference to Alinsky’s 1946 book on his theories of community organizing. In the 1971 letter, Clinton assured Alinsky that she had “survived law school, slightly bruised, with my belief in and zest for organizing intact.”
“A self-proclaimed radical, Alinsky advocated guerilla tactics and civil disobedience (SEIU, Occupy Wall Street, ACORN) to correct what he saw as an institutionalized power gap in poor communities. His philosophy divided the world into “haves”—middle class and wealthy people —and “have nots”—the poor. He took an ends-justify-the-means approach to power and wealth redistribution, and developed the theoretical basis of “community organizing.” “The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power,” wrote Alinsky in his 1971 book. “Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.”
So does Hillary Clinton — indeed the progressive socialist Left — really give a doggone about middle income America? Trust me they don’t. You’re the bourgeoisie against which the proletariat must struggle and ultimately overthrow.If you haven’t read Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals you should. It’s the progressive socialist aka Democrat Party blueprint. And what Alinsky believed in was anathema to that of the fundamental principles and values of America — a Constitutional Republic. His message was easily an American communist manifesto of sorts.
The Free Beacon says, “according to the letter, Clinton and Alinsky had kept in touch since she entered Yale. The 62-year-old radical had reached out to give her advice on campus activism. “The more I’ve seen of places like Yale Law School and the people who haunt them, the more convinced I am that we have the serious business and joy of much work ahead—if the commitment to a free and open society is ever going to mean more than eloquence and frustration,” wrote Clinton.”
There’s a saying down South the ol’ folks use — people will know you by the company you keep — Something we dismissed when it came to Barack Hussein Obama’s radical BFFs.The Beacon says “Clinton’s connection to Alinsky has been the subject of speculation for decades. It became controversial when Wellsley College, by request of the Clinton White House, sealed her 1968 thesis from the public for years. Conservative lawyer Barbara Olson said Clinton had asked for the thesis to be sealed — sounds familiar huh — because it showed “the extent to which she internalized and assimilated the beliefs and methods of Saul Alinsky.” Clinton opponent turned Clinton defender David Brock (George Soros’ Media Matters honcho) referred to her as “Alinsky’s daughter” in 1996′s The Seduction of Hillary Rodham.”
It’s absolutely hilarious how the Left went after Mitt Romney for supposedly “bullying” some kid back in high school or something. They went after him for having a dog ride on the car roof. However, here we go with the ideological cancer that festers in Chicago, and I can bet not a single leftist progressive media outlet is covering this story — check out how they stayed silent about the Federal government exonerating New Jersey Governor Chris Christie in the “Bridgegate” scandal.
No more radicals from Chicago — hmm, I bet Elizabeth “Pochahontas” Warren or Julian “La Raza” Castro probably also have ties to Chicago. I bet if Chicago got rid of all those left wing progressive socialist radicals, the Chicago Cubs would end up winning a World Series!