Since the election of Donald Trump in November, liberals have been twisting a complex tale about Russian collusion to steal the election. As the story goes, Trump had business ties to Russia. Those ties were so deep that Russia was either willing to, or bullied him into, colluding with them to win him the election.Of course, there’s just one problem with this story… there’s no proof. After months of speculating, leaking, and media hysteria, nobody can prove that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. From the beginning, the “investigation” has been a giant dead end.
The truth is that liberals will never find the link between Russia and the Trump campaign, but that doesn’t mean there are no links to Russia at all. In fact, a new video points out that there were plenty of links to Russia during the 2016 campaign, just not from where liberals expect.Watch:
Who received $35 million from a Russian investment fund started by Vladimir Putin? Not Trump, but Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.Who received $500,000 from a company linked to Russian intelligence agencies to give a speech in Moscow? Not Trump, but Bill Clinton.
Who facilitated the sale of 20 percent of America’s uranium to the Russians? Not Trump, but Hillary Clinton.
Who received $145 million from a Russian uranium company? Not Trump, but the Clinton Foundation.Who received millions of dollars in donations from Russian oligarchs? Not Trump, but the Clinton Foundation.
While congressional Democrats and the media desperately try to connect Russia and Trump, the Clinton connection to Russia has been completely ignored. Why? Because these inconvenient facts don’t help the liberal narrative.
Of course, the truth of the matter is that this is one big political charade. It’s an attempt to excuse their shocking defeat and discredit a new president. Democrats aren’t really concerned about Russian influence in American politics. If they were, they’d be equally as interested in whether or not Clinton was colluding with the Russians.So while Democrats foam at the mouth in anticipation for the testimony of former FBI Director James Comey, the facts continue to get in the way of their story. When Comey takes the stand tomorrow, he’ll offer liberals yet another dead end. Maybe they’d have more luck investigating Clinton instead.
[Note: This post was authored by Michael Lee. Follow him on Twitter @UAMichaelLee]