In the wake of Justice Scalia’s untimely death, the hypocrisy’s been flying around the topic of the timing of his replacement. Naturally, Democrats have argued for President Obama’s “constitutional responsibilities” — a laughable phrase in and of itself applied to Obama — to nominate Scalia’s successor before his term ends. The left’s righteous outrage to Republicans arguing for waiting until after the election has been deafening — despite Chuck Schumer arguing for something similar when Bush was in office AND a resolution passed by a Democrat-controlled Senate preventing a recess appointment.
And now, what may be the most inconvenient argument yet against President Obama’s nomination of Scalia’s replacement has just surfaced. Courtesy of none other than President Obama’s own vice president, Joe Biden.
Via The Blaze:
Before he was vice president, Sen. Joe Biden argued in 1992 against a Republican president nominating someone to the U.S. Supreme Court during an election year.
In a clip unearthed by C-SPAN Monday, the Delaware Democrat argued on the Senate floor that President George H.W. Bush should not nominate a new Supreme Court justice “in the full throes of an election year.”“It is my view that if a Supreme Court Justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not — and not — name a nominee until after the November election is completed,” Biden said in the clip, which C-SPAN posted on Twitter.
Now, Biden is the vice president of the in-power party, and President Barack Obama has promised to fulfill his “constitutional responsibilities” to nominate a successor to the late Justice Antonin Scalia before his term ends. But many Republicans have called for Obama’s successor to make the nomination to fill the vacancy. And in 1992, Biden made the same argument:
— CSPAN (@cspan) February 22, 2016
It is my view that if the president goes the way of Fillmore and Johnson, and presses an election-year nomination, the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until after the political campaign season is over.
He added that a lame duck president making the pick would be unfair.
It would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the political season is underway, and it is, action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over. That is what is fair to the nominee and essential to the process. Otherwise, it seems to me Mr. President, we will be in deep trouble as an institution.
Bush didn’t end up making an appointment to the court during the election year. Justice Byron White delayed his retirement until March 19, 1993. President Bill Clinton, Bush’s successor, nominated Ruth Bader Ginsburg in June 1993 and she was confirmed by the Senate that August.
I’m guessing President Obama won’t be too happy about this surfacing.
[Note: This article was written by Michelle Jesse, Associate Editor]