Even as major insurers are warning of unsustainable losses — while some are backing out altogether — President Obama’s signature “achievement,” Obamacare, was just dealt another major blow today. And it’s a major victory for constitutional conservatives.
Via Fox News:
A federal judge ruled Thursday for House Republicans in a challenge brought against the Obama administration over the legality of payments to insurers under ObamaCare.
U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer ruled the spending unconstitutional — while putting the decision on hold pending appeal.
The ruling Thursday marks a win for House Republicans who brought the politically charged legal challenge, and a legal setback for the administration.At issue was a $175 million program authorizing payments to insurers that Republicans claimed were not appropriated by Congress. On the question of whether the money could be distributed anyway under another program, Collyer wrote in her opinion: “It cannot.”
“None of the Secretaries’ extra-textual arguments – whether based on economics, ‘unintended’ results, or legislative history – is persuasive,” she wrote. “The Court will enter judgment in favor of the House of Representatives and enjoin the use of unappropriated monies to fund reimbursements due to insurers” under that section.Collyer said the law is “clear,” and money was not allocated for that program.
She then said she would stay the injunction, giving the administration a chance to appeal. Collyer, with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, is a George W. Bush appointee nominated in 2002.
The controversial payments to insurers were meant to reimburse them over a decade to reduce co-payments for lower-income people.
The House argued that Congress never specifically appropriated that money and denied an administration request for it, but that the administration is spending the money anyway.
Of course, the White House has dismissed this case as a “partisan attack.” Though at the heart of the issue is that little thing called separation of powers in the Constitution — something the Obama administration likes to pretend doesn’t exist.
“Today’s ruling by the DC federal court is an important step toward restoring the separation of powers and stopping President Obama’s power grab. The Constitution is very clear: it is Congress’ job to write our laws and it is the President’s duty to enforce them,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said in a statement.
With that in mind, today’s ruling is a victory not just with regard to chipping away at the disaster that is Obamacare, but also a step toward reinforcing an important pillar of our Constitution — which the Obama administration has been steadily chipping away at during the past seven plus years.
Of course, this ain’t over yet, as the Obama administration is expected to appeal today’s ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
[Note: This article was written by Michelle Jesse, Associate Editor]