If you enjoy scary bedtime stories, read Erick Stakelbeck’s book The Brotherhood: America’s Next Great Enemy about how the Muslim Brotherhood is patiently and subversively infiltrating Western nations with the ultimate goal of gaining control, “Islamicizing” the society and instituting Sharia law.
Did you know the number of mosques in the United States has nearly doubled since the 9/11 attack – and that’s only up to 2012?
This is not a crazy tinfoil theory. This isn’t an Islamophobic moist dream. It is the stated goal of the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliated brethren across the globe.We’ve written here on many occasions about a document called the Explanatory Memorandum written by a Muslim Brotherhood leader and presented as evidence in the largest terror-funding case in the U.S. The Explanatory Memorandum lays out in great detail how the Muslim Brotherhood will bring about “civilizational jihad” in order to destroy the U.S. from within. Specifically, the document says:
The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.
The scary thing is, they’re succeeding, and clueless liberals are enabling if not downright encouraging this movement with open arms.Let’s take for example what might be happening in the White House if Donald Trump loses in November. You’re surely quite familiar with Hillary Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, and her ties to an Islamist journal where she was listed as an editor but the Clinton campaign insists “she really didn’t do anything there.”
Then there’s the little problem of Huma’s mother, who DID in fact write quite radical Islamic essays for the journal and edited a book most feminists – and supposed women’s rights champions like Mrs. Clinton – should find appalling.The New York Post reports, In 1999, Saleha M. Abedin translated and edited a book titled “Women in Islam: A Discourse in Rights and Obligations,” published by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs. Written by her Saudi colleague Fatima Naseef, the book explains that the stoning and lashing of adulterers, the killing of apostates, sexual submissiveness and even female genital mutilation are all permissible practices ¬under Sharia law.
“The wife should satisfy her husband’s desire for sexual intercourse,” the book states on Page 202, even if she is not in the mood. “She has no right to abstain except for a reasonable cause or legal prohibition.”
But getting in the mood may be difficult. The book says female genital mutilation is permissible: “Circumcision for women is allowed.”
Laws promoting feminist equality, moreover, are ineffectual, since “man-made laws have in fact enslaved women, submitting them to the cupidity and caprice of human beings. Islam is the only solution and the only escape.”
“Moreover, women’s biological constitution is different from that of men. Women are fragile, emotional and sometimes unable to handle difficult and strenuous situations,” it explained. “Men are less emotional and show more perseverance.”
There is one exception to the sexual division of roles: “Women can also participate in fighting when jihad ¬becomes an individual duty.”
On the back cover, Saleha says she is “pleased to launch” the book as part of a series on the study of women’s rights in Islam sponsored by the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC), for which she is listed as chairperson.
Founded by Huma’s mom, the Cairo-based IICWC has advocated for the repeal of Egypt’s Mubarak-era laws in favor of implementing Sharia law, which could allow female genital mutilation, child marriage and marital rape.
Oh, and by the way, Saleha is paid by the Saudi government to advocate and spread Sharia in non-Muslim countries like America.Does that sound familiar? (see above, if you need a refresher already)
The pundits are saying Huma Abedin would most likely be appointed chief of staff if Hillary wins. Does that bother anyone else?
It’s not hard to connect the dots folks. Islamists find willing dupes in liberal progressives eager to shine up their “diversity” bona fides and bend over backwards (or frontwards, in the case of Barack Obama’s bow to the Saudi king) to demonstrate how open-minded and peace loving they are. The only problem is, it’s a one-way street. And as Col. West often says, when tolerance is a one-way street, it leads to cultural suicide.
Anybody awake here? Anybody? Anybody?
[Note: This article was written by Michele Hickford]