While much of the mainstream media is still fixated on the controversial Trump tape released this weekend, many of those same outlets are refusing to give attention to the incredible bombshells released about Hillary.
Like this private speech from 2013 where Hillary states she was worried about jihadists entering Jordan among legitimate refugees.
My, doesn’t that sound totally contrary to the sort of campaign rhetoric we’re hearing from her now?
The Daily Caller reports, In a private 2013 speech, Hillary Clinton worried about the risk of “jihadists” entering Jordan with “legitimate refugees” because “they can’t possibly vet all those refugees.”
Clinton today wants to increase the amount of Syrian refugees the United States takes in by 55,000 annually. She believes that the U.S. refugee screening process is comprehensive enough to catch potential jihadists trying to enter the country, though FBI Director James Comey has said that the vetting process is severely limited by a lack of available data.“So I think you’re right to have gone to the places that you visited because there’s a discussion going on now across the region to try to see where there might be common ground to deal with the threat posed by extremism, and particularly with Syria, which has everyone quite worried, Jordan because it’s on their border and they have hundreds of thousands of refugees and they can’t possibly vet all those refugees,” Clinton said before the Jewish United Fund Of Metropolitan Chicago during an October 2013 lunch.
Leftists have been raking conservatives over the coals over the last few years for wanting to stop the influx of refugees coming into America from countries like Syria, due to the very same fears that Hillary articulates in the speech above.According to folks like Clinton and her ilk, it’s “racist” to refuse letting these people in, and we shouldn’t worry about terrorists slipping through the cracks and gaining access to the country, because, you know, the government will “vet” them.
Here’s the harsh reality, the same one Clinton already knows but has been denying for ages in the hopes of winning over Muslim voters.
Over half the individuals who’ve carried out or plotted ISIS attacks here in America are either immigrants or children of immigrants.
According to Truth Revolt, The UK Daily Mail has compiled an impressive and exclusive roster and analysis of ISIS terrorists in America — 62 men and women who have either launched attacks or been accused of plotting terror or assisting ISIS activities in just over a year.
These jihadists such as Omar Mateen (pictured above), who massacred 49 and wounded scores more in the Pulse nightclub attack in Orlando, are responsible for 48 attacks or ISIS-inspired activities, from mass stabbings to attempts to send arms and money to Syria. They have tallied 64 murdered victims and at least 121 wounded.
Six ISIS-inspired attackers have died and 54 have been arrested, according to the Daily Mail’s figures. Thirty-four, or slightly more than half, of those attackers and alleged plotters were either immigrants or the children of immigrants, including six who came to the U.S. as refugees. As the Daily Mail notes, the number of refugees in terrorism “could be higher, as it was not possible to ascertain exactly how many of the alleged ISIS attackers or plotters entered America.”
The analysis shows that 13 people linked to ISIS by the federal authorities were the children of immigrants from countries including “Palestine” and Pakistan, and at least 13 were Americans who converted to Islam. They include a former cheerleader and the son of a senior Boston police officer, as well as an immigrant who was not deported after serving a four-year sentence for a firearms crime.
So, as it turns out, the Hillary from 2013 who made the speech above was absolutely justified in being worried about terrorists mingling in with refugees and immigrants, because that’s exactly what’s happening, right here, on our own soil.
What’s maddening, is that despite knowing this reality, despite being fully aware allowing refugees into the country puts lives at risk, she’s still willing to take this position all for the sake of political expediency.
If that isn’t enough to disqualify her for president, what is?
[Note: This article was written by Michael Cantrell]