Acting out what the Quran commands, ISIS struck again this past Saturday, when a savage barbarian speaking with a clear British accent, smote 44-year-old British aid worker David Haines about the neck, and then beheaded him on video. This is the result of multiculturalism, which equates one’s native culture relative to any other – as matter of fact, it relegates the host country’s culture in subservience.
As Fox News reported, one British citizen – Prime Minister David Cameron – still hasn’t quite figured that out yet. In his interview Cameron said, “We must confront this menace. We must drive back, dismantle and ultimately destroy [ISIS].” And like our own president stated last week that “ISIS is not Islamic,” Cameron asserted Isalm is a religion of peace, stating “they are not Muslims; they are monsters.”
Hogwash! ISIS is completely Islamic.
Cameron also offered Britain’s support of the United States’ decision to take direct military action, but contradicted his earlier statement of calling Islam a religion of peace by then calling the beheading “an act of pure evil.” So which is it?
Additionally, Cameron said Britain will not work to destroy the Islamic State but will work with ally efforts to extinguish this terrorist threat, along with offering a warning against becoming complacent and advising how it, “will merely get worse, not just for us, but for Europe and the world.”
He also stated that countries must “drain this poison from our society” – with which I fully concur. But here again, we have a Western leader who wants to dismiss the problem with “nuanced” language in order not to offend. Stating ISIS isn’t Muslim is like saying those who attacked Pearl Harbor weren’t Japanese.Our Western leaders must stop dismissing the “poison” – the ideology – which they are called to address and confront in Islam, a theocratic-political totalitarian imperialistic ideology. Since Islam’s consolidation and gains in circa 628 AD in Mecca, the world has had to combat it – and after the breaking of the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and the attacking of Mecca, where the commands of Mohammad at the Battle of the Trenches were followed – and as written in the Quran 8:12, Sahih International “[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, “I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.”
To Cameron, I offer the prescient words of a truly great British leader, Sir Winston Churchill, who clearly understood the “Mohammedan” and lucidly characterized them in 1899. Cameron needs to go back and read these words – Obama certainly won’t. After all, he removed Sir Winston’s bust from the White House, an act revealing his true self. Let us stop equivocating and debating who this enemy is – because they are unmistakably telling us who they are. It’s time to stop the PC deliberations in order to make us feel good about not “offending” others – which only results in more beheadings. If we are indeed to “drain this poison from our society,” we must name the poison as a venomous elixir and find the snake pit producing the creatures who are inflicting their fatalistic bites.While we continue to talk, ISIS continues to grow, kill and taunt. As Fox reports, “Haines’s executioner ridiculed Cameron saying the British need to pay the price for his promise to arm the Peshmerga against the Islamic State, and how like his “master Obama,” Cameron will have his own people’s blood on his hands. “
Mr. Cameron, it’s time to stop with the Obama disease of telling the enemy what you’re not going to do – such as not send ground troops – and get to the business of killing these savages
– as I can assure you, Sir Winston Churchill would have done.
Here’s what he said 115 years ago:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”
(Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London).